|
Posted on 12.06.07 by Widge @ 3:49 am
This spam just in… Subject Line: "Wish your male part was larger" Body of the e-mail: "Grinning Ear to Ear , Does it satisfy her? ." Well, let's see. If my male part was grinning ear to ear that would imply that it had a mouth and a pair of ears and it would probably make her scream and scream and scream. In a terrified fashion, as opposed to a "ooh baby baby" fashion. But if she was into that sort of thing then I guess it would satisfy her. But considering that "that sort of thing" would be a scary anthropomorphic schlong, then I don't know many women who would be into it. So. As you were. Filed under: General BS
|
|
Posted on 01.12.07 by Widge @ 8:47 pm
So Earthlink has gone batshit insane. They use blacklists that apparently think half the free world are spammers and as a result, I wasn't getting a lot of my mail. They were basically sending the e-mails into the bit bucket and sending a notice back to the people who e-mailed me. Sadly, since most people are illiterate when it comes to error messages, they saw something that looked like an "undeliverable e-mail" error and took it as such, without realizing that what the text of the message clearly said was actually "we think you're a dirty, filthy spammer, so you can just take your e-mail and toss off." So I took Cringely's advice and went with Gmail. Not really his advice, but just his findings. Gmail is, for better or for worse, the most reliable e-mail service around, according to Cringely's testing. The web interface was pretty sweet. Accessing it through my MDA phone is quick as slick hell. I lasted on it for two days. The reason? Simple. Conversations. The good thing Gmail does is group your e-mails together into Conversations. So if I send you an e-mail with the subject line of "Sup?" And you respond and then I respond, there's a very good chance the subject lines are then "Re: Sup?" So Gmail says, ah, you are conversing, let me put that in one long chain for you. The bad thing Gmail does is group your e-mails together into Conversations without any thought process behind it whatsoever. I send off e-mails to publicists with the subject line of "Coverage." Any e-mail I get back or send with that subject line is now considered to be part of the same Conversation, regardless of who I sent it to or when I sent it. It will pull things out of my Archive and tag it with the Conversation. Here's the kicker: once tagged as a Conversation, it can't be undone. Ever. So rather than have a long ongoing Conversation that shouldn't be, I've plugged Gmail into Outlook and to hell with it. Now, here's the fun part of techie bastards. If I were to take this to a support forum as a complaint/suggestion, I would get a lot of responses probably, and they would boil down to two basic types: 1) Limitation of the service. Maybe some day it will get fixed, maybe it won't. But that's the way the cookie crumbles right now. B) Why would you want to send a bunch of e-mails to different people with the same subject line? I don't have that problem, but that's because I guess I can be unique in my subject lines. The 1) people are reasonable. The B) people infuriate the shit out of me. Because they don't seem to understand what the world needs. The world needs functionality. The world does not need us to conform to someone's idea of functionality. Like with Windows XP. If it installs an update, it will constantly remind you to reboot. If you Google around, you will find lots of people who just say, Eh, go with it. Reboot. What's the big deal? Well, the big deal, fuckers, is that I'm in the middle of something and I can't reboot right now. I'm not one of these dumbshits who will never reboot their machine–I don't need a reboot nanny. In fact, fuck it: I just don't feel like doing it right now. Why should I have to? The point of technology is to add value, not to make us change our ways to conform to somebody else's idea of how something should work. The real winners in providing these services will let you roll your own thing however you want to do it. Which is probably why Wordpress works so well. If you can't do it out of the box, there's somebody who can tell you how (or a plugin). What the hell was my point? Oh yeah. My e-mail's working. That's it, I guess. Filed under: General BS
|
|
Posted on 12.25.06 by Widge @ 5:41 am
Okay, as promised, I'm giving you the gory details on my battle with comment spam on Needcoffee. I wouldn't exactly call what has happened a surrender–I have had to close down all comments on Needcoffee just to keep the server from crashing–I prefer to think of it as a scorched earth policy. Basically, here's what's been happening. And here's why nothing I tried has worked. There's a file in Wordpress that is pinged/called up when you want to post a comment. It's called wp-comments-post.php by default. What the spammers have been doing is hitting that file in order to post their spam on my site. Do they succeed? No, not in the least. For the first part, I have…well, had…all comments moderated. Nothing was ever posted to Needcoffee as a comment without going through me, unless you were a member of the staff and logged into the site. Why do they want to post spam? People ask me this all the time. Basically, there are lots of blogs that have no protection up whatsoever. As a result, these spam bits have links to the spam sites. Sites get Page Rank from Google depending on how many sites link to them, propping up their Page Rank score. That's a simple way of putting it, but that's the gist. So they hammer you with spam in the hopes of improving their standing in Google search findings. Now. This wouldn't succeed even if they did manage to post something, since a rel="nofollow" tag will negate Page Rank boostage from happening. But these spammers and their spammer zombie whateverbots don't care. They will persist regardless of whether or not any comments actually succeed in getting posted. Why? Because they can, that's why. The first thing people say is Akismet. Use Akismet. Well, Akismet is bogus for two reasons. First, just because the comment gets auto-moderated and left off the roll call, that doesn't mean it hasn't taken up space in your Wordpress database. I found this out the hard way after the first 21,000 spam comments rolled through, got caught, and now I have to clean out my database because they're taking up gobs of space. Second, just because the comment gets auto-moderated and left off the roll call, that doesn't mean the spambot hasn't hit your wp-comments-post.php file anyway. It has. And when you've got them coming in like a spam tsunami, sure Akismet keeps them from being posted or even from you having to moderate, but your site will 503 nonetheless. The second thing people say is Bad Behavior. Use Bad Behavior. Bad Behavior helps, but it can be overwhelmed. I can't tell you how BB works, but I literally saw dozens and dozens of bot smacks against wp-comments-post.php a minute coming in. If this is BB when it's on full on strict mode, then without it, gah. So BB doesn't help. Then, I renamed and eventually deleted wp-comments-post.php. Fuck it, says I, if you can't get to the file at all, you can't mess with me, right? Wrong! They're trying to hit the file, there or not, which means the server takes a hit, which means…503. Then, I had DreamHost alter my htaccess file to block hits to the wp-comments-post.php file unless the referrer site is needcoffee. So you can't hit the site from anywhere else. Should help, right? Wrong! They can spoof shit so it looks like it's coming from my site. So I started going in and trying to add bits to the htaccess file to weed out casino and poker spams along with certain IP addresses. The spam detail file I pulled down from BB was so large, I couldn't even process it. I finally deleted everything but the last seven hours, and even that was about 10,000 lines in the CSV file I used to pull it down so I could try and manipulate it. Nothing worked. 503 errors on IE constantly, although strangely Firefox was slow but it could get through. No telling. So finally, boom. Comments go bye-bye. Now at least you can get to the site. If anybody has any ideas on how to effectively stop not comment spam, but the server strain of the spam equivalent of a DDOS attack, let me know. Otherwise, I'm spent. Night. Filed under: General BS
|
|
Posted on 12.04.05 by Widge @ 3:01 pm
Over on Red Nose, all comments are turned off following an attempt at a comment spam blitz that, because we never sleep, we were able to counter within about five minutes. This is what kills me: the spam starts off with something like this… "Wow, great site, very interesting…" And then proceeds to talk about asstraffic or viagra or casinos or levitra or something. So they try and fool you with "Hope you update your site soon…" or the like and then try and sneak their ads in. The only way a comment like that will get online, however, is if somebody's foolish enough not to have some kind of comment spam thing in place to prevent the things from getting up on the site. But if that's the case, then why put the bullshit lead-in to the spam? Do they actually think they're going to fool anyone? "They like my site! Awwww, I'll let them get away with that donkey-raping talk. I like them a lot." I mean, does this make sense to anybody else? Filed under: General BS
|

John Robinson is a writer of prose, poetry and comics who also writes under
the pseudonym of Widgett Walls.
This is my latest book. Short stories written especially for you, or at least someone who reminded me a lot of you at the time.