|
Posted on 01.12.08 by Widge @ 2:11 pm
You know, Dan Goodsell posted this over on his website–his first comic book. And I thought for some time that I remembered my first comic. It was in a drugstore, back when they still had comics–remember "Hey Kids, Comics!" Remember those wire metal racks? When you would flip towards the back to find the ones that weren't fucked up and creased by people flipping towards the back to find the ones that weren't fucked up and creased? Or were you someone like me who was a considerate member of the comics buying community and very cautiously flipped back? Anyway, it was a Justice League of America comic. I remember it was one of those annual crossovers with the Justice Society, and I thought the cover was one of those classic setups where one group of characters was rushing in from left and the other was rushing in from right with the inevitable clash in the middle something that was supposedly inside the pages. What I remember most about it, though, is reading it and recognizing the Justice League characters from the SuperFriends cartoon that I watched religiously (even the shit episodes, and by me saying that probably three or four jumped into your mind). But the Justice Society–the idea that there was a whole separate world out there where the heroes were older (not just older–Batman was dead?!?) and had fought during World War II? Holy crap! From a continuity standpoint I had no clue what was happening, but from a conceptual standpoint I was addicted. Thus, I was introduced to comics and advanced multi-dimensional physics in one sitting. Oh sure, I'm positive I had read some Harvey comics or Disney comics or something when I was younger–but this–this was something else. This was nitroglycerin, baby. And it started me on my love of the spandex genre and comics in general. So I decided to try and track down my first comic. Using this cover gallery. With disappointing results. First, it's hard to distinguish, this far removed from when I was collecting comics on the neurotic level, between comics I bought from the racks and comics I bought later when I was a Collector. Like for example, the 100-page giants–I owned a bunch of those, but I'm certain I bought them later. I'm almost positive, for example, I owned #189 and #190 (the Starro two-parter). But when I acquired them, I have no idea. #191 I don't remember the cover for, but #192 (the start of the Red Tornado origin story) I know I bought from the rack. And then ongoing from there, since I read the Justice Society bit, going back into the Old West and then on through and past the great extra-sized #200. So what JLA book did I pick up first since I can't find a cover that fits what I knew in my mind? Well, my memory is terrible, especially when you go back that far in my life. Is it possible that I crafted some kind of amalgam ur-comic in my head? Is it possible that #192 was my first comic and I've just mixed up the contents with another comic? That was 1981. I was 8. That sounds about right. I do remember that the copy of #192 in my collection was really shredded. So that makes sense. But still, I don't know that I'll ever remember for sure. So. There you have it. What was your first comic? Can you sort out which one it was? Filed under: General BS
|
|
Posted on 12.28.07 by Widge @ 10:55 am
A lot of people seem to appreciate this film. Me, I can't stop screaming at the screen, "Kid! Get off the train! It's full of hollow-eyed zombies–what, are you blind?" Is it just me? Filed under: General BS
|
|
Posted on 12.25.07 by Widge @ 5:31 am
From all of us heathens to all of you heathens. Filed under: General BS
|
|
Posted on 12.14.07 by Widge @ 1:12 am
Okay, so here's some fun. Make yourself comfortable. I went out to find an image for Needcoffee from the archives we've already got on the site so I wouldn't have to grab it from elsewhere (remember, kids: recycle!) and realized that some of our archival pages weren't loading properly on the new server. Brief explanation: on Version 3 of the site (pre-Wordpress) we used frames. We're not proud of it, but it made sense for 1998. The content portion of the site was an .htm file. The frame that went around it and contained the masthead and the menu/sidebar was an .html file. So you could have, for example, a DVD review of Drop Dead Fred and the review itself was ddfred.htm while the frame that held it was ddfred.html. Again, it was the best we could muster at the time. Anyway, while checking out the new server for this old image I wanted, I discovered that the .html versions of pages were coughing up a lung. "An error occurred while processing this directive." Lovely. But the .htm versions were fine. What to do? Well, tear open a .html file and saw that AXS, the web tracking bit we used to use on the old site (and still use in the archives) wasn't working because it was pointing to an old CGI directory and the CGI directory wasn't kosher any longer. So the first thing I tried to do was get the old CGI directory to work, but I couldn't seem to figure out how to do that. And I wanted to get the damn thinking working. So I decided, hey! Screw it, I'll just to a rewrite via the .htaccess and when people go to the .html version, I'll just send them to the direct review instead. That's actually better from an SEO perspective because back when we setup the whole framed system SEO wasn't even a twinkle in anybody's pants. But somehow I botched it and the .htaccess blew up the site for a few minutes. I had a Redirect that never redirected anywhere, and it didn't matter that it was in my /html/dvd/ directory, the server read down through .htaccess, couldn't go any further and barfed. Why did this happen, children? Because Uncle Widge fucked himself over. He got in a hurry and forgot the cardinal rule of screwing around with your site: The Cardinal Rule of Screwing Around With Your Site:That's right. When you forget the Cardinal Rule, Yahweh himself will laugh at you and your site will explode. So. I finally got that corrected after a few minutes outage, and I was able to find some info on how to do this in .htaccess. Not that I think anybody out there has the same setup as the old Needcoffee.com site, but still. You can futz with this to match your own site. This is a variation on what I found at SEOBook, which was the best and closest to what I was trying to do. Disclaimer:So. I basically have an .htaccess in the subdirectory where I want to make this change. I added this to the top:
Here's what I can tell you. The Options and RewriteEngine statement make the thing work to begin with. The rule itself says for every .html hit, rewrite and resend them instead to .htm. Also, it gives a 301 redirect, which is good because search engines need to be able to find the content that's been "moved," or in this case, simply bypassed. The one thing I don't understand is, the way I read this code, it looks like it should only work for the /html/ directory, but it instead works in all subdirectories. So that I'm clueless about. Just for the moment it works. There? Aren't you sorry you asked now? Update: Shade at That's My Stapler tries to help my inept ass out. I think I almost understand what he's saying…I can do coding, me. Filed under: Fun With SEO
|
|
Posted on 12.06.07 by Widge @ 3:49 am
This spam just in… Subject Line: "Wish your male part was larger" Body of the e-mail: "Grinning Ear to Ear , Does it satisfy her? ." Well, let's see. If my male part was grinning ear to ear that would imply that it had a mouth and a pair of ears and it would probably make her scream and scream and scream. In a terrified fashion, as opposed to a "ooh baby baby" fashion. But if she was into that sort of thing then I guess it would satisfy her. But considering that "that sort of thing" would be a scary anthropomorphic schlong, then I don't know many women who would be into it. So. As you were. Filed under: General BS
|
|
Posted on 11.30.07 by Widge @ 1:15 am
Filed under: General BS
|
|
Posted on 11.22.07 by Widge @ 4:46 pm
Jhayne, the Lady Porphyre, is going to Alberta next month. In an effort to raise the $250 needed to prevent a crater in the middle of her wallet, she's selling digital prints, original or no, for $10 a piece. This actually a pretty good deal for everybody involved, because her casual photos are better than any I've ever staged. So. I mean: I'd be paying you $10 to take one of them. Anyway, if you want to see her work, check it out here. Her LiveJournal is here, and you can see the work that I received here. Filed under: Uncategorized
|
|
Posted on 11.16.07 by Widge @ 12:34 am
Slightly late to the party on this one, but here we go. Now that it's been revealed that worrying about terrorists targeting gumballs is fucking lunacy (because really, when all of our public transportation, ports, borders, and everything else is pretty much an open target, gumball protection being a priority is the height of madness), the aldermen reveal their "real" idea: licensing gumball machines. That's right: of all the other problems facing the town like "overcrowded housing, taxi ordinances and redevelopment projects" says the Daily Record (cached version here), not to mention others we can probably think of because they're problems everywhere (education, perhaps?), we want to license gumball machines. [Alderman Frank] Poolas said he is convinced that the town needs to license gumball machines and other currently-exempt devices to better protect children against food-borne illnesses and defective toys. He also said such a licensing scheme could make it easier to track down someone who might use gumball machines in an unlikely, if not impossible, attempt to poison kids. Source. Question: when was the last time you heard about a kid getting sick from something they ate out of a gumball machine? Has there been an E. coli outbreak from gumballs that I haven't heard of? I'm being serious when I ask that…is this really some sort of safety issue I've just missed? And the defective toys business…what does that mean? If the spider ring breaks within 30 days of purchase? (And yes, I know some toys shouldn't be given to kids to screw around with, but if the parent won't check the toys to ensure they're not going to kill their kid, they probably expect Alderman Poolas to come and ensure that the doors to where they keep the drain cleaners are secured as well. Should we license parents?) And let's go ahead and think like a loony alderman for about five seconds. Let's assume that all gumball machines are licensed, and the government is wasting lots of money and time making sure they know what goes in the gumball machines and where it's come from. Then let's assume, because we're in Loony Alderland, that a terrorist decided that poisoning gumballs was a good idea. Are they going to log this on a schedule somewhere? No, they're going to do Bad Things to the gumballs without said Bad Things showing up anywhere. So all your vaunted licensing won't help you. No, you're trying to build a bridge not just where there's no water, but in the middle of the Gobi desert. Why not just be up front about it and say you want to eek some more money in a scheme that adds absolutely no value to the experience of getting a gumball out of a machine? At least then I could have some respect for you idiots. You must be proud, Dover. You must be so proud. Filed under: Ranting
|
|
Posted on 11.14.07 by Widge @ 11:51 pm
Filed under: General BS
|
|
Posted on 11.08.07 by Widge @ 10:10 pm
This is interesting. So Headspace2, the badass plugin that I'm using over on Needcoffee currently, has a Frame Breaker built into it. WTF is a Frame Breaker? Well, you know how when you search in Google Images, you get presented the site below a Google frame up top? The Frame Breaker breaks you out of that frame, natch, so you get served the site without the Google flavoring up top. I always did wonder about that, so I flicked it on. That was around the 22nd or 23rd of October. I decided to come back and check to see how it had affected my traffic on Google Images. Now, let me state this up front. My understanding is that Google Images doesn't update very often. And I also understand that for the majority of my images, I haven't SEO'd them up worth a good goddamn because at the time I was putting them up, I had no idea why I should. (Of course, people still seem to find me and force me to do shit like this.) So I don't have a great deal of traffic coming in anyway. But let's look. Google Images spiked the day I turned it on, then went to a reasonable trickle. As for Google Images.ca? I went from a trickle…to nothing. Google Images.uk? From an erratic mess to…nothing. And pretty much on down the line. Did it do anything to my regular Google results? No. No discernable change. In fact, if I just do "images" and pull that chart up, I spike, and then crater. Fascinating. Now. One of two things is happening. 1. Either Google Images doesn't like the frame break and has something built in which makes me show up lower in the results because of it. Or… 2. Google Images needs the frame to show up as Google Images in my Analytics. I don't know which. If I had a huge amount of Google Images traffic, I would be able to see if my Google hits went up an equivalent amount, so maybe Images traffic was being counted as regular traffic. Just a theory. Or, if I had Analytics installed on my Version 3 archival part of the site, which has no Frame Breaker, I could see if it suffered, yes or no. I've heard rumors that breaking the frame caused Google Images to not speak to you anymore, but never really saw that substantiated. And trying to Google terms like "frame breaker google images penalty" and the like didn't really get me anywhere. Either way, I'm taking off the Frame Breaker. I'll see if it changes anything and if so, how quickly. And hopefully, I'll get Google Images out here to reindex my site with the SEO'd bits I do have. If anybody has their own experience, I'd love to hear it. Filed under: Fun With SEO
|
| « newer posts | previous posts » |

John Robinson is a writer of prose, poetry and comics who also writes under
the pseudonym of Widgett Walls.
This is my latest book. Short stories written especially for you, or at least someone who reminded me a lot of you at the time.