Comments on: Libertarians Split Down the Middle? How Mysterious… http://www.widgettwalls.com/2006/06/19/libertarians-split-down-the-middle-how-mysterious/ Fresh from my brain pan to the breakfast tables of the world. Sun, 06 Nov 2011 08:57:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: ScottC http://www.widgettwalls.com/2006/06/19/libertarians-split-down-the-middle-how-mysterious/comment-page-1/#comment-8423 ScottC Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:51:18 +0000 http://www.onetusk.com/otjournal/?p=308#comment-8423 [sigh] I know that politicians in both parties try to have it both ways with 'civil unions' and letting the states decide. But Bush and the Republican leadership is for an amendment against gay marraige. And allowing radical religious conversatives a strong voice in their party and constantly trumpeting 'family values' shows how the GOP feels about gays. [sigh] I know that politicians in both parties try to have it both ways with 'civil unions' and letting the states decide. But Bush and the Republican leadership is for an amendment against gay marraige.

And allowing radical religious conversatives a strong voice in their party and constantly trumpeting 'family values' shows how the GOP feels about gays.

]]> By: Widge http://www.widgettwalls.com/2006/06/19/libertarians-split-down-the-middle-how-mysterious/comment-page-1/#comment-8406 Widge Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:02:10 +0000 http://www.onetusk.com/otjournal/?p=308#comment-8406 Kerry was against it because he wanted it to be a state decision, but he's against gay marriage. <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/05/06/democrats_platform_shouldnt_back_gay_marriage_kerry_says/" rel="nofollow">Citation.</a> Of course, both parties are equally wrong on this issue because it shouldn't be the government's business who you marry as long as the union is consentual and the bride isn't, for example, 8. Kerry was against it because he wanted it to be a state decision, but he's against gay marriage. Citation. Of course, both parties are equally wrong on this issue because it shouldn't be the government's business who you marry as long as the union is consentual and the bride isn't, for example, 8.

]]> By: ScottC http://www.widgettwalls.com/2006/06/19/libertarians-split-down-the-middle-how-mysterious/comment-page-1/#comment-8402 ScottC Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:34:36 +0000 http://www.onetusk.com/otjournal/?p=308#comment-8402 What do you mean? Bush was for an amendment banning gay marriage. Kerry wasn't. That seems to be a difference of opinion. What do you mean? Bush was for an amendment banning gay marriage. Kerry wasn't. That seems to be a difference of opinion.

]]> By: Widge http://www.widgettwalls.com/2006/06/19/libertarians-split-down-the-middle-how-mysterious/comment-page-1/#comment-8401 Widge Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:24:48 +0000 http://www.onetusk.com/otjournal/?p=308#comment-8401 None taken, but considering the Democratic contender and the Republican contender for President last time around had the same opinion on that, you might want to be careful who you throw your weight behind. None taken, but considering the Democratic contender and the Republican contender for President last time around had the same opinion on that, you might want to be careful who you throw your weight behind.

]]> By: ScottC http://www.widgettwalls.com/2006/06/19/libertarians-split-down-the-middle-how-mysterious/comment-page-1/#comment-8398 ScottC Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:49:39 +0000 http://www.onetusk.com/otjournal/?p=308#comment-8398 No offense, but since one party doesn't think gay people should have as many rights as straight people, I think it matters a little. No offense, but since one party doesn't think gay people should have as many rights as straight people, I think it matters a little.

]]>